Digital health research and the three-thousand-dollar problem
Health is where article processing charges bite hardest, and where the research least able to pay is often the research most worth reading.
Read on →What we are looking for in each field, how review works here, and what publishing without a fee actually involves.
Health is where article processing charges bite hardest, and where the research least able to pay is often the research most worth reading.
Read on →We have no impact factor, no Scopus listing and a short back catalogue. Here is the honest case for submitting anyway, and when you should not.
Read on →Most technology research is written about the places where technology research is funded. The sample is unusual and the field treats it as general.
Read on →Most journals treat a contradiction between methods as a problem to fix before submission. We think it is often the finding, and we will publish it.
Read on →Most open access now means the author pays. It does not have to, and the arithmetic of who gets published changes when it does.
Read on →Nearly every claim made about AI today was made about an earlier machine. Historical work is the cheapest correction a field with a short memory can buy.
Read on →Desk screen, reviewer selection, what we ask reviewers to do, and what each decision actually means. Written down so you can hold us to it.
Read on →Sociology has been studying technology for a century. It should not cost three thousand dollars to say so.
Read on →We accept work from any discipline and reject a lot of it at the desk. This is the line, with examples on both sides of it.
Read on →Classroom evidence about technology mostly stays in internal reports, because the journals that would publish it charge more than a school will pay.
Read on →No submission fee, no article processing charge, and authors keep copyright. We publish work on technology from any discipline.
Browse subject areas Submit a manuscript